Tactical Urbanism

The design studio, under the theme of "Tactical Urbanism," aimed to develop architectural design approaches sensitive to the dynamic processes of urban contexts. Participants were expected to base their projects on either integrating with or reinterpreting the existing economic, social, and cultural dynamics of the city. The design process was structured not only around physical production but also through a pedagogical approach emphasizing representational methods and knowledge generation.

The main objectives of the studio were:

To analyze, represent, and discuss urban dynamics at both micro and macro scales.
To evaluate the spatial interventions within the context of their relationships with place and environment, exploring the potentials of these relationships.
To provide participants with the opportunity to experience individual and collective knowledge production processes in design.
To establish an interactive relationship between the discipline of architecture and social, cultural, and economic contexts.

1. Analysis and Representation of Urban Dynamics

In the initial phase, participants were tasked with analyzing and representing the dynamics of urban flows at micro and macro scales. This phase focused on:

Conceptualizing the city as a dynamic and systematic whole, where all components interact collaboratively (Alexander, 1965).
Identifying voids, boundaries, and thresholds that could serve as tactical intervention areas.
Exploring how physical, economic, and social processes within the urban context could inform spatial interventions.

2. Knowledge Generation and Development of Design Approaches

The second phase involved interpreting the representations and data gathered in the first phase to establish the conceptual basis of the projects:

Participants reinterpreted the economic, social, and cultural operations of the selected regions through representational techniques and methodologies.
Individual insights and critical discussions gave rise to diverse design problems and conceptual solutions.
Collaborative environments for knowledge sharing and critique were central to the design process (Luck, 2007).
Broadly attended jury sessions enriched the design process with diverse pedagogical feedback and perspectives (Goldschmidt et al., 2014).

3. Analysis and Project Development

The final phase emphasized further analysis of the project areas and the development of context-specific design methods:

Provisional forms were generated to evaluate the impacts of tactical interventions and to align with the contextual framework.
The theme of "Tactical Urbanism" was integrated as a fundamental part of the design process, where the representations produced throughout the studio were reevaluated.
Participants explored potential relationships within the urban context, forming unique design concepts and decisions that culminated in architectural productions.

Conclusion and Evaluation

The studio facilitated the development of architectural projects that explored the potentials of tactical interventions and produced context-sensitive solutions responsive to urban dynamics.

Through representational methods and knowledge generation, participants critically reinterpreted the economic, social, and cultural framework of the city within a conceptual structure.
Individual approaches, collective knowledge-sharing practices, and critical discussions were integral to the design process.
The resulting projects underscored the notion that architectural design is not solely about physical production but also about the interaction with social and cultural contexts.

This process offered a rich experience for both participants and educators, contributing to the redefinition of architectural thinking within the dynamic and complex context of urban environments.

For more detail